KitsAndParts.Com Forum

A place to exchange information about parts and kits supplied by http://kitsandparts.com

You are not logged in.

#26 2008-10-01 08:54:30

ak2b
Administrator
From: New York City
Registered: 2008-08-12
Posts: 338

Re: Erector RX

I added the 51 ohm resistor to the input of the Gilbert Cell audio detector. I recorded the audio (band noise) before and after I installed the resistor and it sounds like this: (change is half way through)
http://tomnyc.no-ip.org/hycas_before_an … _50ohm.mp3
I then downloaded a trial version of DSSF3 (looks like a real good program) from
http://www.ymec.com/products/dssf3e/index.htm and found the difference in gain to be about 6db. I still have plenty of audio gain. It was too late in the evening to hear anything on 20 meters. I'm not sure of any improvement and I don't really know how to evaluate this. I am sure of one thing, apparantly, I have gain to spare smile.  I'll give a listen tonight to see if I hear anything significant.
So far lowering the gain in the LM386 has made the most signicant improvement in the quality of what I hear (and don't hear).

I tried the 100pf cap from input to output on the LM386 but didn't notice any change.

Tom, ak2b

Last edited by ak2b (2008-10-01 09:01:16)

Offline

 

#27 2008-10-03 10:52:15

ak2b
Administrator
From: New York City
Registered: 2008-08-12
Posts: 338

Re: Erector RX

I got another LM386 audio amplifier and made some measurements. I measured with the 10ufd cap between pins 1 and 8 and with pins 1 and 8 open. With pins 1 and 8 open (minumum gain) I measured 26db. With the 10ufd cap between pins 1 and 8 (maximum gain ) I measured 46db. Both min and max gain measurements were identical to the spec sheet.
I kept wondering why the spec sheet was saying gains of 20db minimum to 200db maximum. As it turns out, they weren't saying this. The were saying gains of 20 and 200 (ratio of output voltage/input voltage). Expressed in db (20 * log V1/V2) this comes out to 26db and 46db respectively. How I came up with 68db in a previous post is beyond me.
The moral of this is - don't believe everything you read - particularly when it comes from me smile.  My apologies.

I hope to make more measurements like MDs, blocking dynamic range and two tone dynamic range tests in the near future. I will try and outline my test procedures so that if someone sees any glaring errors, they will tell me. This will be a first for me.

Tom, ak2b

Offline

 

#28 2008-10-03 17:38:27

kc0wox
Member
Registered: 2008-08-12
Posts: 65

Re: Erector RX

Tom:
All I have to say is you must be retired as you have way too much time. I still work for a living so I can't keep up with you. I have about 12 kits sitting and waiting for assembly. That may be a couple of years from now but it is coming down the pike.

You are doing a great job! I enjoy reading your posts.
Leonard
www.kc0wox.com

Offline

 

#29 2008-10-04 22:57:49

ak2b
Administrator
From: New York City
Registered: 2008-08-12
Posts: 338

Re: Erector RX

C'mon Leonard, the little LM386 Amplifier Kit takes 15 minutes to assemble. You can't tell me that you are not tempted to put together at least one of your 12 kits. I timed myself today and built the Gilbert Cell audio detector in 76 minutes. The diode ring mixer took a little longer. I figured I'd build up some boards and test them individually since on the first go around I was too impatient to get something working. Also, I can do different things with different boards and just swap them out.

I like to build and after building every kit available (or at least it seems) I got tired of just stuffing parts onto a board. The only time I would learn anything is when it didn’t work. These little boards are a lot of fun and easy to modify and I’ve learned a great deal in the process of building my transceiver.

In any case, thanks for your nice comments and I hope it doesn’t take years before you get back into building. Your web page on Double Balanced Mixers and screen shots from your spectrum analyzer are excellent and are better than any text book I've ever seen in explaining what happens with a DBM.

Although I would like to be, I am not retired and still work. I am not married and live in a city apartment so come Saturday morning there is no need to mow the lawn or mend the fences. I just make some coffee and head for the shop – which in my case is the dining room table - about a foot from where the coffee is made. smile

Tom, ak2b

Offline

 

#30 2008-10-05 14:10:04

kc0wox
Member
Registered: 2008-08-12
Posts: 65

Re: Erector RX

Tom:
My problem is after I build them, I want to test them and make a video and a web page. Thats what takes the time. I am lucky enough to have some test equipment, even if it is old, that is good. That along with the video hobby is what takes time. Also, I am very active on the bitx forum and have several things going on there.
Leonard

Offline

 

#31 2008-10-14 13:54:47

ak2b
Administrator
From: New York City
Registered: 2008-08-12
Posts: 338

Re: Erector RX

I spent the weekend trying to do some meaniful measurements with my Erector RX. This turned out to be more difficult than I anticipated. I used this document from the ARRL to run the tests:
http://www.arrl.org/members-only/prodrev/testproc.pdf
This is not the latest versions of the ARRL's test procedures but for my purposes it is good enough.

I am so unsure of the results that I'm not going to post them until I get a little bit more confident in my procedures. I have a K2 and plan to test both radios one after another. At least with the K2 I know around where I should be measuring.

Tom, ak2b

Offline

 

#32 2008-10-15 09:03:53

ak2b
Administrator
From: New York City
Registered: 2008-08-12
Posts: 338

Re: Erector RX

I measured the Minumum Discernable Signal (MDS) on the Erector RX and the K2 and came up with about -127dbm on both of the them. The specs on the K2 say -130dbm with the preamp off.
It was very hard to measure signal noise levels since they were jumping all over the place on my meter. I used the dbm scale on a program called Total Recorder to set the noise level to -6db and then adjust the signal generator (HP8640B) to read -3db on the same scale. I did the test three times on both radios and could duplicate the results as close as possible considering the jumpy meter. There is room for error here.
The K2 with no antenna connected sounds like it is dead smile. It really comes alive with an antenna. I forgot how quiet the receiver is.

On to Blocking Dynamic Range.

Tom, ak2b

Offline

 

#33 2008-10-16 08:13:58

ak2b
Administrator
From: New York City
Registered: 2008-08-12
Posts: 338

Re: Erector RX

http://tomnyc.no-ip.org/images/bdrtestsetup.jpg

The two step attenuators and the HP8640B I bought on eBay. I paid about $100 each for the attenuators and about $300 for the HP8640B. The Mini-Circuits ZFSC-2-6 http://www.minicircuits.com/pdfs/ZFSC-2-6.pdf was $50 direct from Mini-Circuits. After collecting all this over a period of time this is the first serious testing I have done with all of it together.
I quickly tried a BDR test on both units last night and came to the conclusion that quick tests aren't the way to go. The Erector RX looked better than the K2 by quite a lot. I know this can't be right.
The test procedures described by the ARRL left me a little confused. I will try again.

Tom, ak2b

Offline

 

#34 2008-10-16 17:44:06

kc0wox
Member
Registered: 2008-08-12
Posts: 65

Re: Erector RX

I've bid on 8640's several times but haven't been lucky enough to win yet. I use an IFR1200S from work to do MDS tests. I have an HP function generator and it works great as a signal source but it doesn't do any levels lower than -40 db out. I have an HP step attenuator but the function generator leaks out enough RF that any measurements below -40 db are useless. It is nice though as I can keyboard input a frequency in down to 1 uhz resolution.

I'm looking forward to the time in a few months that I can get back to the toolkits boards. I'm currently working an a manual for assembling a bitx20 version 3 pcb. You can see it at http://golddredgervideo.com/kc0wox/bitx … manual.htm When I finish it, I have a few other things that I have been working on.
Leonard

Offline

 

#35 2008-10-17 09:43:23

ak2b
Administrator
From: New York City
Registered: 2008-08-12
Posts: 338

Re: Erector RX

Hi leonard,
I've gotten the best bargains on eBay just about Christmas time when people have their minds on other things. The HP8640B is a great instrument if you happen to get one in decent shape. I took a chance and bought mine without warranties and no proof of calibration. The XG2 is also quite handy since it puts out a pretty accurate low level signal at 1uv (-107dbm). One of the handiest pieces of test equipment I own is the FPM-1 power meter/frequency counter from m3electronix http://www.m3electronix.com/features1.html I also bought the RF Calibrator from them. It claims to measure RF down to -72dbm.  I put it up there in usefulness with my AADE L/C meter - you can live without it, but I'd rather not.
Talk about having enough time, I looked at your manual and other things you've done with the Bitx20. That's a lot of work, Leonard smile.

Tom, ak2b

Offline

 

#36 2008-10-28 10:38:10

ak2b
Administrator
From: New York City
Registered: 2008-08-12
Posts: 338

Re: Erector RX

My test results are just too flakey at this point so I’ve decided to hold off writing anything on the subject until I feel more confident. I was trying to do a 20KHz Blocking Dynamic Range test when I found the that the Universal Dual Band Pass Filter could be peaked significantly only 20KHz away which was very likely going to throw of any meaningful measurement. I have the wide band (single band) version which I will put in later. There were other problems that cropped up like not getting the same results every time I ran the tests.
I have a few of the pin diode switches made up that I want try out and will report on them in a bit.
In the meantime, I use this transceiver almost daily and can tell you that it works quite well. Aside from the low power and being in the armpit of the sunspot cycle, I've still managed to have some really solid QSO's stateside as well as having worked about 20 countries.
I also need to box this radio up a little tighter as it has grown unwieldy in size smile.

Offline

 

#37 2008-11-06 09:42:48

ak2b
Administrator
From: New York City
Registered: 2008-08-12
Posts: 338

Re: Erector RX

http://tomnyc.no-ip.org/images/ErectorRXFilters.jpg

One row of the BPF's, LPF's and pin diode switch boards are mounted on the back of the transceiver. The pin diode switch between the low pass and band pass filters, I realized after I mounted it, is not needed since it is duplicated on the transmitter board. I rewired the transmitter board according to the schematic to accommodate using the LPF for both transmit and receive. Actually, I could probably also use a pin diode switch on the output of the DDS VFO to switch between the TX and RX frequency and do away with the splitter and attenuator entirely. The switch on the left below the meter position will handle the TX/RX voltages for three bands so I'm adding 15 meters to my original 20M/17M transceiver. I should be finished by this weekend and will report further.
Sometimes I feel like the dumbest person on earth. Forever I thought that the labels XMIT+8 and RCVE+8 at J1 on the linear amp meant the signal lines plus 8 volts. This threw me off for the longest time until I saw the pin diode switches with the same labels. Finally it dawned on me that this lines were simply 8V TX and 8V RX. Oh well, it's not the first time I've been so stupid, when I was first licensed in the early 60's, for years I thought SKN was Silent Key Night smile.

Tom, ak2b

Last edited by ak2b (2009-04-19 09:12:27)

Offline

 

#38 2008-11-09 12:29:19

ak2b
Administrator
From: New York City
Registered: 2008-08-12
Posts: 338

Re: Erector RX

http://tomnyc.no-ip.org/images/ddspinswitch.jpg

After wiring everything up for 20 meters and listening to the receiver I now had birdies all over the place. I figured adding a pin diode switch to the FCC-2 might solve the problem since one output would be muted during transmit or receive. Well, it didn't work out that way. After checking everything I could think of I found that while in receive I still had considerable output on the transmit side of the pin diode switch and therefore the TX output of the FCC-2 going to the BPF was very strong causing hetrodynes . The problem eventually turned out to be that the 8 volt transmit switch still had about .4 volts on it when it should be 0V during receive. I have four inputs to the 8V transmit line and when I disconnected the one going to the Linear Amplifier (J1 pin 1) the line would go to zero volts and the birdies disappeared. This .4 volts was enough to cause a problem with the pin diode switches or at least they did on my rig.
At this point, I've got to figure out why I have the .4 volts. If anyone else has the Linear Amplifier and could check pin 1 of J1 it would be a big help. Otherwise I could just add another transistor for supplying +8V to the linear.
Aside from this problem the Pin Diode Switchs are pretty cool and fairly easy to implement.

Tom, ak2b

Offline

 

#39 2008-11-10 16:15:23

ak2b
Administrator
From: New York City
Registered: 2008-08-12
Posts: 338

Re: Erector RX

After poking around  Q1 on the Linear Amplifier the TX 8 volt line (J1 pin 1) went to 0 volts while in receive and everything sounds fine. Why the problem went away, *I don't have a clue. It doesn't appear to be intermittant - just a solid 0 volts while in receive. The downside to all this is the power dropped down to 1.5W smile.
Oh well, time for a little trouble shooting.

Tom, ak2b

*I have a feeling, now that I think about it, that the TX voltage problem might have come from poor grounding on the Linear Amplifier and moving the board around may have temporarily solved the issue.
*11/20/08 Actually, the voltage comes from Q1 through R2.

Last edited by ak2b (2008-11-11 08:36:17)

Offline

 

#40 2008-11-12 21:40:03

W4GNS
Member
From: Virginia
Registered: 2008-08-15
Posts: 132

Re: Erector RX

OK, I could not stand the pressure of seeing AK2B's post/pics any longer, I finally started melting solder today, and got the IF Amp board done, I'm away from home on the left coast and had lots of distractions from the folks I work with ,so little got done, maybe tomorrow I'll get more boards done.  Where is a good source to get the copper board  to mount the kitlet boards to? Another question, Tom , what software are you using to record your sound files?  I have lots of questions , so I figger I can light this board up with questions !!
73 Gary W4GNS


"The secret to creativity is knowing how to hide your sources." Albert Einstein
http://releases.ubuntu.com/10.10/
Más mujeres y el tequila

Offline

 

#41 2008-11-13 08:15:01

ak2b
Administrator
From: New York City
Registered: 2008-08-12
Posts: 338

Re: Erector RX

Hi Gary,

Glad to see you are getting started. Maybe now I won't be so lonely here smile
I bought my double sided circuit board material about 4 years ago on e-Bay but I can’t remember where. A quick search shows there are still a lot of suppliers though the price looks a little higher than I remember.
Originally, I recorded with Sound Recorder supplied with Windows XP but found it a little limiting. I ended up buying Total Recorder for $18 which was a lot more versatile. http://www.highcriteria.com/ There are probably other programs out there that do an equal or better job and might even be free – I didn’t research it that much.
Have fun and I look forward to hearing/seeing your results.

Tom, ak2b

Offline

 

#42 2008-11-15 14:33:43

W4GNS
Member
From: Virginia
Registered: 2008-08-15
Posts: 132

Re: Erector RX

Question 1 : Anyone know what we shoulld be expecting feature wise with the up coming Keyer for the RF Tool Kits boards? Diz any comments?

Question 2 : Should I/we be starting new topics on this forum, or just riding along on AK2B's thread?

Comment: Just put in a decent order to Papa Diz so should have lots of boards in a few days ;-), also ordered a extra mixer board so I may start a new project, as Diz only gives the very bare minimum of info, so us folks that are RF ignorant have to actually read the handbooks and google alot, which in turn inspires new projects and ideas ....hummmmmm, wonder if that is intentional?


"The secret to creativity is knowing how to hide your sources." Albert Einstein
http://releases.ubuntu.com/10.10/
Más mujeres y el tequila

Offline

 

#43 2008-11-16 17:36:32

kc0wox
Member
Registered: 2008-08-12
Posts: 65

Re: Erector RX

Gary:
Have you seen my videos page for the Kits and Parts boards? It's at http://golddredgervideo.com/kitsandparts/index.htm and if you haven't seen the mixer one, be sure and take a look.

I haven't had any time to expand it for a while.
Leonard

Offline

 

#44 2008-11-16 18:06:21

ak2b
Administrator
From: New York City
Registered: 2008-08-12
Posts: 338

Re: Erector RX

w4gns wrote:

Question 2 : Should I/we be starting new topics on this forum, or just riding along on AK2B's thread?

Hi Gary,
Feel free to start a new topic.
Tom, ak2b

Offline

 

#45 2008-11-16 19:43:18

W4GNS
Member
From: Virginia
Registered: 2008-08-15
Posts: 132

Re: Erector RX

Hi Leonard
   Yes, I am aware of your videos but need to see them again, later maybe, as I use a wireless connection for internet and my current location is very slow, I'm in southern Washington hauling WindMill blades and expect to be here through the winter, so no prime and fast connection for awhile, unless they upgrade the towers while I'm here ;-)  I'm trying to download the mixer video now, but it does not look good, my connection is really shakey here, If I were back out east 180megs would only be a few short minutes
   And so noted on new topics Tom
  Thanks guys

PS Leonard  , I do have my copy of EMRFD and the 2007 ARRL Handbook with me, so all is not lost  ;-)




kc0wox wrote:

Gary:
Have you seen my videos page for the Kits and Parts boards? It's at http://golddredgervideo.com/kitsandparts/index.htm and if you haven't seen the mixer one, be sure and take a look.

I haven't had any time to expand it for a while.
Leonard

Last edited by W4GNS (2008-11-16 19:51:03)


"The secret to creativity is knowing how to hide your sources." Albert Einstein
http://releases.ubuntu.com/10.10/
Más mujeres y el tequila

Offline

 

#46 2008-11-26 13:23:59

ak2b
Administrator
From: New York City
Registered: 2008-08-12
Posts: 338

Re: Erector RX

This is pretty much where I am now as far as figuring out how to switch bands. I found out that the Pin Diode Switches can only handle 10mw smile I put a diode in series with R2 on the Linear Amplifier to keep voltage from appearing on the +8V TX line while in receive. This cured the problems with hetrodyning. The Linear Amplifier is back to being fed the way it is in Diz's schematic.
The relays I used here are what I had on hand but eventually I may add 15 meters and this may change the type of relays used.
Tom, ak2b

http://tomnyc.no-ip.org/images/erectorblockdiagram.jpg

Offline

 

#47 2008-11-27 10:02:11

kc0wox
Member
Registered: 2008-08-12
Posts: 65

Re: Erector RX

Take a look at the specs for these relays. http://pdf1.alldatasheet.com/datasheet- … -B301.html If you are interested, I will send you what you need. I have about 100 of them I purchased for another project. I think I paid about 15 cents apiece. I have the dpdt non-latching with a 12 volt coil circuit board mount. V23079-A1011-B301 is the part number of what I have. I can probably get a few thousand more if you needed them. It says they will switch 5 amps or 60 watts. They are a little over 1/4" wide and a little over 1/2" long.
Leonard

Offline

 

#48 2008-11-27 19:21:14

ak2b
Administrator
From: New York City
Registered: 2008-08-12
Posts: 338

Re: Erector RX

Hi Leonard,
That is a very generous offer. I e-mailed you off list with my request.
Thanks,
Tom, ak2b

Offline

 

#49 2008-11-29 09:45:26

ak2b
Administrator
From: New York City
Registered: 2008-08-12
Posts: 338

Re: Erector RX

*http://tomnyc.no-ip.org/cqwwdxSunday.mp3


I changed the mp3 to a recording made on Sunday with a lower bit rate so the file is smaller. The board where the keyer chip was mounted was loose and hanging as I was doing some other work on the radio. I remounted it and it sounds a lot better. I used a 15W outboard RF amplifier while this was recording. My 4 watts or so  wasn't getting any results as I started later in the morning after the band had changed a bit. The QSK is not quite as good but the results were better.
My original message is posted below as quoted by Gary

Tom, ak2b

*this is a 2MB file

Offline

 

#50 2008-11-29 10:41:00

W4GNS
Member
From: Virginia
Registered: 2008-08-15
Posts: 132

Re: Erector RX

Sounding GREAT Tom, Get-er-Done!!   
    I do have have a question.  I spent 4 years running around NYC and Long Island as a mobile, I found the city almost impossible to hear much for the noise, of course Long Island was not too bad. What are you using as an antenna and how are you defeating the extreme noise?
73 Gary W4GNS




ak2b wrote:

*http://tomnyc.no-ip.org/cqwwdx08.mp3

Sorry about the lousy sounding sidetone.

Here is little Saturday morning CQWWDX on 20 meters at 1300Z. I started off ok at 1300Z and worked S57DX(Slovenia), M6T(England) and ES5TV(Estonia). I took a coffe break and came back at about 1400Z and had a hard time working anyone until OG2M(Finland) at the end. The band changes that quickly in the AM here.
Contests are great for the QRP ego. So many of the EU's have contest clubs with antenna farms as large as Rhode Island. Fortunately, they can hear my 5 watts quite easily. Sometimes later into a contest, the weaker signals are not to be dismissed since a lot of them are running low power with a good set of ears smile
Sometimes I use MixW's cw decode mode on the contest stations sending cw at mach III. If the qrm isn't all that bad, MixW can copy them pretty well.

Tom, ak2b

*this is a 4MB file


"The secret to creativity is knowing how to hide your sources." Albert Einstein
http://releases.ubuntu.com/10.10/
Más mujeres y el tequila

Offline

 

Board footer

Powered by FluxBB